|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||
|
|
Court Rules Yellow Pages Usage Claims By Yellow Book USA Are False Download this press release as an Adobe PDF document. A federal court ruled today that Yellow Book USA Inc. made false statements of fact claiming greater use of its yellow pages directories as compared to Verizons SuperPages. NEW YORK (PRWEB) October 8, 2004 -- A federal court ruled today that Yellow Book USA Inc. made false statements of fact claiming greater use of its yellow pages directories as compared to Verizons SuperPages. In a decision handed down today by Judge Jack B. Weinstein of the U.S. District Court in Brooklyn, the court found that Yellow Book USA Inc. violated the Lanham Act by falsely claiming, as to national and some specific geographic areas, that the usage of Yellow Books yellow pages was substantially greater than it actually was, as compared to the usage of Verizons Superpages. Judge Weinstein had previously ordered that a second phase of the trial take place on Dec. 13 to fix the amount of damages that Verizon has suffered. However, Verizon and Yellow Book reached a settlement, and the December trial has been canceled. Terms of the settlement are not being disclosed. The court noted that Verizon enjoys substantially greater usage of its directories nationally and in most of the local markets in which it competes with Yellow Book. The court determined that Yellow Books claims of greater usage were false and misleading, and that Yellow Book knew they were false when it made them. The courts decision today sends a clear message to Yellow Book: Stop deceiving advertisers and the public, said Lester Chu, vice president strategic planning and marketing for Verizon Information Services. Directory usage is a critical factor to an advertiser in making a purchasing decision, he said. The evidence presented to the court overwhelmingly demonstrated that Yellow Book could not -- despite its marketing campaign -- truthfully claim that it had greater usage than Verizon SuperPages in any major market where the two companies compete. After the judge criticized Yellow Book during the trial, Yellow Book stopped making the false claims in radio and television commercials and also directed its sales force to stop making the erroneous claims. In addition, the court ruled that in some of its sales collateral Yellow Book referenced research studies performed by the Harris research organization that employed dubious survey methodology; the data was then manipulated by Yellow Book employees, resulting in inflated usage figures for Yellow Books directories compared to those for Verizon in some geographic areas. Chu said, This is a victory for ethical business practices. The true winners today are all business owners small and large who depend upon factual information to make critical decisions about where to spend their advertising dollars. We pride ourselves on integrity and ethics. With this decision, I hope that Yellow Book will now join us in that effort.
About Verizon SuperPages and SuperPages.com
# # #
|
|||||||